Pakistan is our blood we can not survive without its circulation in our vains when this country was born Lord Attaly who was a head of Govt in Uk wrote a letter to the Prisident of states (Churchal} " Don't divide India into two states, new state can not exist power will go into the hands of wagabond and freebooters every thing will be taxed and only the air will be free and finally India will be divided into more states on the basis of religion and sectarianism"
These are the words of a priminister of Uk at that time I will discuss his all points but for today I only take his first thing that (New State will not Exist) All we know Pakistan is surviving and surviving well, survival depends on what we have achieved and what are our prospects for the future. Only in 58 years Pakistan not only have survived but became Atomic Power. Secondly, Pakistan is not an anonimous country its known throughout the world so we are famous in world only in 58 years who knows in west where is Fiji but everybody knows where is Pakistan and Kashmir. Thirldly, we have adopted in Pakistan a policy of industrialization and liberalization which is giving its fruits in only 58 years Last month united nation report for human development and industrialization praised Pakistan Policies, Fouthly, when Pakistan born we had no army but today we can defend ourself . Fiftly, when we started we had no industries only three sugar mills and few others but today situation is different. Finally when we started we were backword and uneducated but today we have raised our literacy to 50 percent in general and 90 percent in urban populatin. So, I don't agree with the view of then Priminister that's why George Bush Said Pakistan has survived through a tough time and now its time of its prosperity and strngth. No doubt we are great nation we proved it in 58 years and now we are with the world and time will come we rule the world Zinda Bad My Pakistan
9 comments:
Offcourse, we did good job by surviving in toughest condition, one hand Churchal ( I think it was churchal who wort this to Attalay who was PM of that time ) was right, in 58 years we saw lot of thugs in power and what did tey do to Pakistan we all know, Yes it is a miracle we are still surviving while our half the body has been detached from us, it happened to Pakistan but it did not happened to India, do you think agitation is not happing in India .Yes! it does, but at least they are sincere with the system, Today we are happy about Mr Bush statement, yesterday (About 35 years ago) we were very unhappy about 6th FLEET , which spoused to come for Pakistan,s help, 58 years now we don’t know how to rule ourself , ruling the world would be very wishfull
The most shocking news for every learned person is a seperation of pakistan into two wings I have studied the history books and found no reason why these parts were seperated only I have got and told you that the politician in both side misinterpretated things and manuplate the public opinion in their ways, people in both side was poor, economy in both side was fluctuating to nil but politician in west wing were strong so they didn't want to give ruling chance to east wing I must add a word here that greedy politician lost there country but never lost their power to rule and thorn and same in both side till now the most powerful political elements are those who divided the country. Mujeeb and family and Bhoto and family and powerful army. India is strict to their system becaz by nature they are good slaves and docils, they were strict to british rule and their laws I tell you incident of their nature in British rule if a white man kill a Indian he was only fined 5 Rs, once an wife of killed person went to recive her money she was so happy after getting the money she prayed for the long life of killer and his prosperity. So naturally they will be adhered to their system of slavary. But Pakistani People had have a different story we never think we are second to anybody we belive in miracle and do miracle we belive at our shoulders and help of God we can not be ruled we always deviced the ways to rule and conqurred the world and our this habbit gave us independenc, we can not stick to a slavary system we want to rule the world by nature and always detect ways for this I still remember when Nwaz Sharif asked the people if you will bear the hunger for Atomic Blast next day in the streets of Pakistan millions of Peaple came in his support. so Pakistan goes this do or die.
We did try democracy , which was, and is alien to us through the history of Islam, before British Raj , India was shackled in chains of feudalism which was inherited to us people. Except for the first Caliphate, power throughout Islamic history has been won and lost by the sword. This is true of other civilizations as well but while the world of Christendom was able to make the transition from kingdoms and empires to nation-states, the world of Islam was unable to do the same on its own. The nation-states that constitute the Islamic ummah or commonwealth today came into being as a result or under the impact of colonialism. We can not impose Islam on ourself, how can we impose it on other world, every Islamic stats has its own Islam, by such a interpretation that’s suits to the ruler of stats, in past and present may be in future too, too much interference of religion in state matter forced Akbir Azam to form Din a Allahi, same reason king Herry of England tried his best to get rid of Romma church, which he could not , in his life time but his daughter did after his death, and I believe that was the first seed secularism, which allow man and man kind to get out of its boundaries to explain the unexplainable, every good thing come with price tag , and west has paid it and still paying it in shape of culture less society
what is democracy I have studied in the books of political sciencs ( Govt of the people by the people) suppose if in a society all the thiefs are living so who will be the head of state as per domocracy naturally the thief who will get more votes in the same way if all theocrates are living the big theocrate will be the head of state. So its big criticism at democracy that in this farm of Govt only we count the people we don't weigh them, any actor, gambler, sex abused can become head of state of America by getting more votes. So now world has given two democracis, western democracy and Islamic democrcy in Islam democracy means govt of the people by the people with the condition that head of state should qualify some basic ethics and junctions dictated by Allah. Democracy is not new to Islam actually Islam gave the real principal of democracy how all the four caliphs were elected only with the consultaions of people every tribe dicussed and gave the name of new leader or supported the proposed leader after the death of (physical} prophet all the muslims gethered in a big hall and propsed the name of first caliph this process continued till last caliph after that we killed the Islamic democracy and adopted kingship or dictatorship at name of Islam. All the umyads and Abbasids were cruel dictators or kings why they did it this is a long story and lengthy argument so i leave it here and come to the next point. What is a westrn state a curse in disguise they don't kill you directly but squeezes your blood and every energy, they give you some symptomatic treatment and leave the disease there, drink wine and fuck your girl friend even if you are doing it at the road, take hundred and give ten back if you need, make money if u can get it by fucking your mother do it. don't tell a lie but say openly I am stanic, I am sexy I need girl or boy, so this is the standard of their truth, make every evil legal then say liberty and justic is for every one, for example eliminate death palenty, rape palenty, gambling palenty, illegal making of money palenty, then what justic court will give you beacuse they have dirctly or indirectly legalized every crime and that's why we are happy here becz we don't need to controll our bad habits here every sin is right. If this is the meaning of transformation or secularism then westrn society soon will be finished as great Poet Allama Iqbal said. your Last point why you want to separate state from religion we are muslims and our religon is natural we don't need to leave it yes if you want to adopt western values mentioned above then you need to leave religion otherwise its very simple belive in god and its pricipls. this is also a lengthy topic we will discuss it some day. Professor Sadeed Masood
Thank you Mr Masood for your detail answer, hope below mentions would be eye opener 34-year old Sehr Jan, an Afghan refugee, died in childbirth on October 8 at Jalozai Camp near Peshawar, the capital of Northwest Frontier Province (NWFP) bordering Afghanistan. On October 6, 19-year old Laila Jan gave birth to a stillborn baby in the same Camp. Sehr was the tenth mother to perish in childbirth, whereas Laila's baby was the 53rd victim of infant mortality since August 30 when the Islamist government of NWFP - Muttehida Majlis-e-Amal (MMA) - banned male doctors and technicians from carrying out ultrasound examinations and using electrocardiographs (ECG) on female patients. Is kind of Islam we want impose on world, these people are in power by counting of votes not weight of vote, are we trying to impose Islam which prosper under the Muslim MP of NZ who legalized prostitution bill, in my point of view Islam is religionof tolerance , we can see intolerance in your article by using lot of F word, on other hand you admitted frailer of Islamic democracy by saying it was killed by Maavia , who was binder of our Holy Book Quran, where were those votes with lot of weights to used it against Maavia , there was only one vote went against this dictatorship, that was Imam Husain , who gave ultimate surfies, Because he believed and he was sincere with the system, not to mention, according to my information there were 18000 vote with lot of Wight Iqbal also said “JUDA HO DIN SE SIASIT TO REH JATI HAI CHANGAIZI” which cuts both ways
I am not saying anything against anybody actually when you quote history then you can not change it, In his famous book Maulan Maudodi [ Khalafit and Mouloqiat} said these words history proves all the Abbasids and Umayads were kings and dictators they were not like the first four Caliphs, please take my words I am not saying agaist Moavia but I am talking in general I think Issue of Moavia and Hussain can not be discussed openly at net some people may be heart and I don't wana do this. Acctually you have mentioned a good principle of nature " there is always a difference between what is happening and what should be happend" so this is with Islam what is happening is no good and what should be happend is not comming Islam is opposite to illiteracy, injustic, dictatorship, sectairianism, extremism, terrorism, exploitation, self defined rules, abuses of any kind, suppression of women, arranged marriages in which you don't ask the willing of bridal and bridgroom, but my dear all is happening but it doesn't mean it is in Islam. Finally I don't use any obsene word or Fohish it was the need of my artical to fullly elaborate the topic for other people and it is not Fohish in Islam my intention was good. But still if you feel it I am sorry and will try to hide the truth in future.
Thank you Mr Masood We all appreciate your article, I thought there are lot of other ways say F thing, but eny way it was need of article’ what kind of double standards is this one hand you say you are not against Mavia and other hand you say , after first four all other were kings or dictators, My point was SYSTEM and sincerity with system, I don’t mind Islam, Hindo, chirst or Bhuda or Sikh, even a prostitute , sitting in brothel will not succeeds unless she is not sincere with job It is human nature to abused the power, that’s what Mavia did , that’s what Abbass did that what Akbir did that what Calinton did and that what Bush is doing, power of true democracy is , we know what happing around us, and leaders are accountable to public, on other hand you say Islamic democracy, where we don’t count vote , but weight vote, this means a person with NO “WEIGHT†would be less human , then a person with WEIGHT It right truth hurts, its only hurts when you don’t have GUTS to Liston it , and don’t have GUTS to write it
I am nothing I can not give any verdict agaist anybody I can not judge the things which people more genious learned with better intution and knoweldge than me could not do. I always avoid to give my verdict in the pure issues of Islam always depend on history or other scholars better than me. But no doubt i am with Hussain and Hussain war was with Yazid so I am agaist Yazid and Abne zyad and shimar and hurmalah bin qahir I don't do it rationally and I don't need to prove it this is my belive in Hussain and believe is always blind. To weigh means check the deeds and action as per verdict of quran and sunah no doubt if a person is not a true muslim is not a good human as we are not true muslims and also not good man.
With all respect I am disagree with you, first we need to be human, then it is choice what you want be, I have never heard of Muslim bird or Muslim animal, but for sure I met with a lot of good human , they are not Muslim, Every system or religion, in place, is for humans and for betterment of humans, what I try to established no matter what system we adopt we should stick with it with whole heartedly, by keeping this in mind nothing is perfect but ALLAH Almighty, who has given us brain to make it perfect by not repeating our mistakes, Forgive me if I am wrong, believe need explanations , FAITH don’t
Post a Comment